Relatively Awful

August 23, 2006 at 1:58 am | | cartoons

Let’s find the most poopy cartoon involving Einstein. Get a wiff of Figure 1 for some truely poopy cartoonin’.

untitled.GIF
Figure 1. Look at me.

What is wrong with Einstein’s arms? Is he wearing a burlap sack? Is that a chalkboard? I don’t even want to start, baby, with the dialog.

So, the challenge is to find a worse cartoon. My numbers suggest at least 10^3 terrible Einstiens out there. Find them and post them. If you’re not a member, place the link in the comment section, and I’ll make Kendall post it for you. Happy hunting and godspeed.

18 Comments »

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

  1. Kendall, see to it that these people’s needs are met.

    Comment by william — August 23, 2006 #

  2. Jigga-what?

    Comment by kendall — August 23, 2006 #

  3. Scanning through several sites (laser is actually chugging away for once), I’ve noticed an interesting trend. Many people are writing E=Mc2 instead of E=Mc2.

    Comment by kendall — August 23, 2006 #

  4. Kendall, have you ever considered that E = Mc2 is actually right? Well, have you? Think about it…

    Comment by sam — August 23, 2006 #

  5. Reminds me of Bob

    Comment by kendall — August 23, 2006 #

  6. Well, I guess in theoretical units (h=c=k=1), it’s only off by a factor of 2…

    Comment by kendall — August 23, 2006 #

  7. Exactly. That was exactly what I was thinking, Kendall.
    .
    And if by E, you mean 2E, this equation is perfect.
    .
    Now explain Fm = a

    Comment by sam — August 23, 2006 #

  8. Easy. Assume theoretical units such that F=m=a=1. Then, 1=1, which is true iff Chuck Norris > infinity.

    Comment by charles — August 23, 2006 #

  9. Chuck Norris disproves the continuum hypothesis independent of the axiom of choice.

    Proof:

    Assume there exists a transfinite set whose cardinality is aleph 1. Then, putting it in 1 to 1 correspondence with the reasons Chuck Norris is better than Burger King, you will find that regardless of whether or not you can choose to have it your way, there will always be a platitude of Chuck Norris that cannot be represented by a combination of Burger King food. QED.

    Comment by kendall — August 23, 2006 #

  10. Forgot the lemma proving that the set of Burger King’s menu item combinations is isomorphic to R. The proof is left as an exercize for the reader.

    Comment by kendall — August 23, 2006 #

  11. Here’s a little turd for your pleasure.images2.jpg

    Comment by william — August 23, 2006 #

  12. Likewise:

    Comment by kendall — August 23, 2006 #

  13. Great. A masterpiece.MakeitWhat.sized.jpg

    It’s not Einstein, but still awesome.

    Comment by william — August 23, 2006 #

  14. HAHAHAHAHAHA feel my wrath!

    notice the awesome M^c 2 formula!

    Comment by ilya — August 23, 2006 #

  15. Beg for mercy!

    Comment by ilya — August 23, 2006 #

  16. yes yes, i like to hear you cry

    Comment by ilya — August 23, 2006 #

  17. Sod it, man.

    What is that? British slang for British Einstein?

    Comment by william — August 24, 2006 #

  18. Things get more massive with increasing velocity, but need I remind you of lorenzt contraction? A human being can hump say as fast as one meter per second. This makes gamma about .999999999999999999999999 give or take. So while engaging in coitus the maximum amount of contraction happens probably midway through the thrust making the male penis 1/.9999999999999999999999 times smaller. I kid you not, my girlfriend has actually been able to notice this effect.

    Comment by Albert — November 11, 2006 #

Leave a comment

thanks for the comment

Powered by WordPress, Theme Based on "Pool" by Borja Fernandez
Entries and comments feeds. Valid XHTML and CSS.
^Top^