Comments on: acs boston update 2: wednesday http://blog.everydayscientist.com/?p=634 remarking on the unremarkable Thu, 09 Sep 2010 00:10:19 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 By: sam http://blog.everydayscientist.com/?p=634&cpage=1#comment-39334 sam Thu, 04 Feb 2010 00:39:57 +0000 http://blog.everydayscientist.com/?p=634#comment-39334 ha! how come no one called me on that? i debated between "isopentane" and "2-methylbutane" ... then chose neither. ha! how come no one called me on that? i debated between “isopentane” and “2-methylbutane” … then chose neither.

]]> By: Matt http://blog.everydayscientist.com/?p=634&cpage=1#comment-39322 Matt Wed, 03 Feb 2010 03:35:24 +0000 http://blog.everydayscientist.com/?p=634#comment-39322 that's 2-methylbutane, dumbass. that’s 2-methylbutane, dumbass.

]]> By: joel http://blog.everydayscientist.com/?p=634&cpage=1#comment-15623 joel Fri, 24 Aug 2007 16:19:38 +0000 http://blog.everydayscientist.com/?p=634#comment-15623 Thanks for summarizing all these talks. Peter's setup sounds very interesting and I wonder if it works the same way a typical AFM measures tip displacement. I also hadn't realized SM-Michaelis-Menten had been done before Pat Collier's recent work. Thanks for summarizing all these talks. Peter’s setup sounds very interesting and I wonder if it works the same way a typical AFM measures tip displacement.

I also hadn’t realized SM-Michaelis-Menten had been done before Pat Collier’s recent work.

]]> By: Everyday Scientist » acs boston update 2.5: posters http://blog.everydayscientist.com/?p=634&cpage=1#comment-15593 Everyday Scientist » acs boston update 2.5: posters Thu, 23 Aug 2007 20:53:18 +0000 http://blog.everydayscientist.com/?p=634#comment-15593 [...] the polymerases and chain length (using a similar technique to what Antoine van Oijen did—I summarized his stuff before). His conclusion was that DNAP moves past the position of RNAP (either over it or pushes it along [...] [...] the polymerases and chain length (using a similar technique to what Antoine van Oijen did—I summarized his stuff before). His conclusion was that DNAP moves past the position of RNAP (either over it or pushes it along [...]

]]>